From b898f9507979a507fe8546759694047a16d408ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Plessy Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:40:25 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?Caf=C3=A9?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- biblio/18622036.mdwn | 10 ++++++++++ tags/synteny.mdwn | 9 ++++++--- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 biblio/18622036.mdwn diff --git a/biblio/18622036.mdwn b/biblio/18622036.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c27891eb --- /dev/null +++ b/biblio/18622036.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!meta title="Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes."]] +[[!tag Drosophila synteny]] + +Bhutkar A, Schaeffer SW, Russo SM, Xu M, Smith TF, Gelbart WM. + +Genetics. 2008 Jul;179(3):1657-80. doi:10.1534/genetics.107.086108 + +Chromosomal rearrangement inferred from comparisons of 12 Drosophila genomes. + +[[!pmid 18622036 desc="“This analysis reveals between 42 (D. sechellia) and 1430 (D. willistoni) syntenic blocks across various species on the basis of the D. melanogaster gene order.” “Comparison of syntenic blocks across this large genomic data set confirms that genetic elements are largely (95%) localized to the same Muller element across genus Drosophila species and paracentric inversions serve as the dominant mechanism for shuffling the order of genes along a chromosome.” “When we infer that a breakpoint is reused we mean that two or more breakage events occurred within the nucleotide interval between blocks, but the events are not necessarily coincident within the breakpoint”"]] diff --git a/tags/synteny.mdwn b/tags/synteny.mdwn index 4c67537f..150cfa8c 100644 --- a/tags/synteny.mdwn +++ b/tags/synteny.mdwn @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@ [[!meta title="pages tagged synteny"]] -[[Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007)|biblio/17994087]] sequenced -across the _Drosophila_ genus and showed synteny conservation ranging -between few large blocks with many genes to many small blocks with few genes. +[[Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007)|biblio/17994087]] sequenced across +the _Drosophila_ genus and showed synteny conservation ranging between few +large blocks with many genes to many small blocks with few genes. [[Bhuktar +and coll. (2008)|biblio/18622036]] counted “between 42 (D. sechellia) and 1430 +(D. willistoni) syntenic blocks across various species on the basis of the D. +melanogaster gene order”. [[Carbone and coll. (2014)|biblio/25209798]] found 96 gibbon–human synteny breakpoints (~30 per Gb), associated with segmental duplication or Alu element -- 2.47.3