From 4aecc8e5be37ea17c7db069600347665cece6eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 14:43:50 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?Caf=C3=A9=20aujourdhui?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- biblio/10.1007_BF03045329.mdwn | 10 ++++++++++ tags/Oikopleura.mdwn | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 biblio/10.1007_BF03045329.mdwn diff --git a/biblio/10.1007_BF03045329.mdwn b/biblio/10.1007_BF03045329.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d94bddea --- /dev/null +++ b/biblio/10.1007_BF03045329.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +[[!meta title="Distribution of pelagic tunicates in the western part of the Bay of Bengal"]] +[[!tag Oikopleura]] + +P. V. Bhavanarayana, P. N. Ganapati + +Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section B (1972) 75: 1. + +Distribution of pelagic tunicates in the western part of the Bay of Bengal + +[[!doi 10.1007/BF03045329 desc="O. dioica reported in the bay of Bengal."]] diff --git a/tags/Oikopleura.mdwn b/tags/Oikopleura.mdwn index 7267b640..3e23f267 100644 --- a/tags/Oikopleura.mdwn +++ b/tags/Oikopleura.mdwn @@ -448,5 +448,7 @@ Ecology - In the northern south China sea, _O. longicauda_ and _O. rufescens_ were reported to be more abundant than _O. dioica_ in 2006 by ([[Li and coll., 2012|biblio/10.1007_s13131-012-0243-7.mdwn]]). + - _O. dioica_ was reported in the bay of Bengal by [[Bhavanarayana and + Ganapati in 1972|biblio/10.1007_BF03045329]]. [[!inline pages="tagged(Oikopleura)" actions="no" limit=0]] -- 2.47.3