From 41f024b21fee8f67b50f6080e92c4acbf28d39c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Plessy Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:31:17 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Publish III, for real this time ? --- "Debian/debi\303\242neries/contrib.en.po" | 24 +++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git "a/Debian/debi\303\242neries/contrib.en.po" "b/Debian/debi\303\242neries/contrib.en.po" index 2e368588..f7a86725 100644 --- "a/Debian/debi\303\242neries/contrib.en.po" +++ "b/Debian/debi\303\242neries/contrib.en.po" @@ -5,11 +5,12 @@ # Charles Plessy , 2013. # Charles Plessy , 2013. # Charles Plessy , 2013. +# Charles Plessy , 2013. msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2013-04-21 05:30+0000\n" -"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-04-21 14:23+0900\n" +"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-04-21 14:31+0900\n" "Last-Translator: Charles Plessy \n" "Language-Team: bar\n" "Language: en\n" @@ -61,7 +62,6 @@ msgstr "" "files, or cause the installation of non-Free materials." #. type: Plain text -#, fuzzy #| msgid "" #| "La zone _contrib_ est l'objet de sempiternelles questions car il n'est " #| "pas toujours facile de tracer une ligne entre utilisable et " @@ -90,16 +90,16 @@ msgstr "" "The _contrib_ area is an endless source of discussions, as it is not always " "easy to draw the line between what is usable and what is useless without " "remote services. I wonder if it would be better to replace the _contrib_ " -"area by a new priority: “remote”, lower than _extra_. Packages that are " -"entirely Free (source and binary) and that do not cause the installation of " -"proprietary software would be fit for _main_. For the packages that can not " -"function without non-Free software, given that the work to be done to free " -"them is the same regardless whether the proprietary code is included in the " -"source package (in _non-free_) or not (in _contrib_), I think that in both " -"cases the package should be in _non-free_ as it is not Free in practice." +"area by a new priority level, “remote”, lower than _extra_. Packages that " +"are entirely Free (source and binary) and that do not cause the installation " +"of proprietary software would be fit for _main_. For the packages that can " +"not function without non-Free software, given that the work to be done to " +"free them is the same regardless whether the proprietary code is included in " +"the source package (in _non-free_) or not (in _contrib_), I think that in " +"both cases the package should be in _non-free_ as it is not Free in " +"practice." #. type: Plain text -#, fuzzy #| msgid "" #| "Cela permettrait de trancher avec un critère simple : la sélection d'un " #| "paquet binaire entraînera-t-elle l'installation de logiciels privateurs ? " @@ -121,6 +121,4 @@ msgstr "" "package trigger the installation of non-Free files? If yes, the package and " "its source belong to _non-free_. If not, they belong to _main_. Then, if " "they need to access a remote service that would not be possible to set up on " -"a network where only Debian is available, their priority would be _remote_. " -"This category might also reduce the tension that accumulates around " -"_software as a service_." +"a network where only Debian is available, their priority would be _remote_." -- 2.47.3