From 2ed23405dbbb02dafa9804517b02f8fb894a9383 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Charles Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:03:21 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] =?utf8?q?Caf=C3=A9?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- biblio/11157786.mdwn | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 biblio/11157786.mdwn diff --git a/biblio/11157786.mdwn b/biblio/11157786.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ef430d86 --- /dev/null +++ b/biblio/11157786.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +[[!meta title="How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila."]] +[[!tag Drosophila muller_element synteny chromosome]] + +Ranz JM, Casals F, Ruiz A. + +Genome Res. 2001 Feb;11(2):230-9. doi:10.1101/gr.162901 + +How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila. + +[[!pmid 11157786 desc="186 DNA probes on Muller element E (density: 1 / 175 kbp in D. mel and 1 +/ 219 in D. rep) for comparing gene order in _D. repleta_ and _D. melanogaster_. Random distribution of breakpoints. “177.07 (±28.88) breakpoints or 89 (±14) paracentric inversions fixed in this chromosomal element between D. melanogaster and D. repleta.” “Application of [a] ML method [...] yielded an estimate of 228 (±28) fixed breakpoints, that is, 114 ± 14 fixed inversions.” “We estimate an evolution rate of 0.9–1.4 chromosomal inversions fixed per million years.” “A significant correlation of gene order was found.” “If large inversions have a low probability of fixation because of their fertility effects (Navarro et al. 1997), which seems to be the case (Cáceres et al. 1997), then the randomization of gene order would proceed at a slower rate than is implied in Figure 2.”"]] -- 2.47.3