From: Charles Plessy Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 05:22:53 +0000 (+0900) Subject: Syntax X-Git-Url: https://source.charles.plessy.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=10b38c19dc61e50d0580735f5da80e1ecd49be9c;p=source.git Syntax --- diff --git a/tags/template_switching.mdwn b/tags/template_switching.mdwn index 5712f8ee..7af520cb 100644 --- a/tags/template_switching.mdwn +++ b/tags/template_switching.mdwn @@ -22,15 +22,15 @@ Originally, the TSOs were all-RNA. Since this is expensive to synthesise, TSOs where only the last 3 bases are RNA became popular. LNA was also tested as a replacement for RNA. - - [Picelli et al (2013)|biblio/24056875] reported a higher performance for + - [[Picelli et al (2013)|biblio/24056875]] reported a higher performance for RRL compared to RRR, when preparing Smart-seq2 libraries. - - [Harbers et al (2013)|biblio/24079827] used the nanoCAGE protocol to compare + - [[Harbers et al (2013)|biblio/24079827]] used the nanoCAGE protocol to compare TSOs ending in RRR, DDD, DDL, DLL or LLL, and reported that only the RRR TSOs had good efficiency (less PCR cycles needed to amplify the cDNAs) and had the lowest amount of strand invastion artefacts. - - [Arguel et al (2017)|biblio/27940562] reported similar performance for + - [[Arguel et al (2017)|biblio/27940562]] reported similar performance for RRR and RRL, using a 5′-focused method similar to nanoCAGE or STRT. [[!inline pages="tagged(template_switching)" limit=0]]