Bandage

diff --git a/biblio/26099265.mdwn b/biblio/26099265.mdwn
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..97f3042
--- /dev/null
+++ b/biblio/26099265.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!meta title="Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies."]]
+[[!tag assembly]]
+
+Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE.
+
+Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 15;31(20):3350-2. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383
+
+Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies.
+
+[[!pmid 26099265 desc="Interactive visualisation and command-line generation of reports."]]

diff --git a/tags/assembly.mdwn b/tags/assembly.mdwn
index 8d4962e3e665e8b1f437c941557132c6cc0c4b57..79f5f2d7c008a07ff3da60853217eccfbe0f794f 100644 (file)
--- a/tags/assembly.mdwn
+++ b/tags/assembly.mdwn
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ fast. Shasta assemblies tend to be more fragmented, but have less disagreement
 with the reference.  Shasta also comes with polishing modules similar to Racon
 and Medaka, but also  to be faster. 
 
+Some genome assemblers produce a graph file that can be visualised
+with tools such as Bandage [[Wick and coll., 2015|biblio/26099265]].
+
 After assembly, the contigs can be further polished with Racon ([[Vaser, Sović,
 Nagarajan and Šikić, 2017|biblio/28100585]]).