Publish III, for real this time ?

diff --git a/Debian/debiâneries/contrib.en.po b/Debian/debiâneries/contrib.en.po
index 2e36858831acf40390ac8ebb8bf0d073c8a722c2..f7a867256c5dfe59d5e91dd63d42c8bcd8c794f9 100644 (file)
--- a/Debian/debiâneries/contrib.en.po
+++ b/Debian/debiâneries/contrib.en.po
@@ -5,11 +5,12 @@
 # Charles Plessy <foo>, 2013.
 # Charles Plessy <foo>, 2013.
 # Charles Plessy <foo>, 2013.
+# Charles Plessy <foo>, 2013.
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2013-04-21 05:30+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-04-21 14:23+0900\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-04-21 14:31+0900\n"
 "Last-Translator: Charles Plessy <foo>\n"
 "Language-Team: bar\n"
 "Language: en\n"
@@ -61,7 +62,6 @@ msgstr ""
 "files, or cause the installation of non-Free materials."
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#, fuzzy
 #| msgid ""
 #| "La zone _contrib_ est l'objet de sempiternelles questions car il n'est "
 #| "pas toujours facile de tracer une ligne entre utilisable et "
@@ -90,16 +90,16 @@ msgstr ""
 "The _contrib_ area is an endless source of discussions, as it is not always "
 "easy to draw the line between what is usable and what is useless without "
 "remote services.  I wonder if it would be better to replace the _contrib_ "
-"area by a new priority: “remote”, lower than _extra_.  Packages that are "
-"entirely Free (source and binary) and that do not cause the installation of "
-"proprietary software would be fit for _main_.  For the packages that can not "
-"function without non-Free software, given that the work to be done to free "
-"them is the same regardless whether the proprietary code is included in the "
-"source package (in _non-free_) or not (in _contrib_), I think that in both "
-"cases the package should be in _non-free_ as it is not Free in practice."
+"area by a new priority level, “remote”, lower than _extra_.  Packages that "
+"are entirely Free (source and binary) and that do not cause the installation "
+"of proprietary software would be fit for _main_.  For the packages that can "
+"not function without non-Free software, given that the work to be done to "
+"free them is the same regardless whether the proprietary code is included in "
+"the source package (in _non-free_) or not (in _contrib_), I think that in "
+"both cases the package should be in _non-free_ as it is not Free in "
+"practice."
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#, fuzzy
 #| msgid ""
 #| "Cela permettrait de trancher avec un critère simple : la sélection d'un "
 #| "paquet binaire entraînera-t-elle l'installation de logiciels privateurs ? "
@@ -121,6 +121,4 @@ msgstr ""
 "package trigger the installation of non-Free files?  If yes, the package and "
 "its source belong to _non-free_.  If not, they belong to _main_.  Then, if "
 "they need to access a remote service that would not be possible to set up on "
-"a network where only Debian is available, their priority would be _remote_.  "
-"This category might also reduce the tension that accumulates around "
-"_software as a service_."
+"a network where only Debian is available, their priority would be _remote_."