--- /dev/null
+[[!meta title="Nanopore sequencing and the Shasta toolkit enable efficient de novo assembly of eleven human genomes."]]
+[[!tag assembly method software]]
+
+Shafin K, Pesout T, Lorig-Roach R, Haukness M, Olsen HE, Bosworth C, Armstrong J, Tigyi K, Maurer N, Koren S, Sedlazeck FJ, Marschall T, Mayes S, Costa V, Zook JM, Liu KJ, Kilburn D, Sorensen M, Munson KM, Vollger MR, Monlong J, Garrison E, Eichler EE, Salama S, Haussler D, Green RE, Akeson M, Phillippy A, Miga KH, Carnevali P, Jain M, Paten B.
+
+Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Sep;38(9):1044-1053. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0503-6
+
+Nanopore sequencing and the Shasta toolkit enable efficient de novo assembly of eleven human genomes.
+
+[[!pmid 32686750 desc="Runs in memory (no disk IO) and requires terabyte amounts for human genome. Designed for Nanopore data. Reads are run length encoded before assembling. Assemblies are more fragmented, but with less disagreements to the reference. The estimated cost of running is lower than for competitors."]]
reported by [[Istace and coll. (2017)|biblio/28369459]] to be able to assemble
mitochondrial genomes, unlike Canu and other assemblers.)
+The Shasta assembler [[Shafin and coll., 2020|biblio/32686750]] is designed for
+Nanopore data. Reads are run length encoded before assembly, to mitigate the
+impact of errors in homopolymer tracts. The assembly runs entirely in memory;
+it needs terabyte amounts for a human genome, but as a consequence it runs
+fast. Shasta assemblies tend to be more fragmented, but have less disagreement
+with the reference. Shasta also comes with polishing modules similar to Racon
+and Medaka, but also to be faster.
+
After assembly, the contigs can be further polished with Racon ([[Vaser, Sović,
Nagarajan and Šikić, 2017|biblio/28100585]]).